The difference between APO model and the reverse merger is that the APO includes a funding at the time the transaction closes. Therefore much of the APO’s success is due to the involvement of the Investment Bank as the funding source and gatekeeper that standalone reverse mergers do not possess.
In a traditional reverse merger, private companies can buy a shell and go public regardless of their current financial status. The companies range from pre revenue startups to large revenue producing companies with sufficient profits who may not be seeking an initial round of funding when they first go public. The beauty part of an APO or reverse merger is that it gives companies many choices.
Other posts of the serie
- Alternative Public Offering – Part 1 - May 5, 2009
- Alternative Public Offering – Part 2 - May 6, 2009
- Alternative Public Offering – Part 3 - May 7, 2009
- Alternative Public Offering – Part 4 - May 8, 2009
- Alternative Public Offering – Part 5 - May 12, 2009
- Alternative Public Offering – Part 6 - May 13, 2009
- Alternative Public Offering – Part 7 - May 14, 2009
- Alternative Public Offering – Part 8 - May 15, 2009
- Alternative Public Offering – Part 9 - May 16, 2009
- Alternative Public Offering – Part 10 - May 18, 2009
- Alternative Public Offering – Part 11 - May 19, 2009
- Alternative Public Offering – Part 12 - May 20, 2009
- Alternative Public Offering – Part 13 - May 21, 2009
- Alternative Public Offering – Part 14 (This post) - May 22, 2009
- Alternative Public Offering – Part 15 - May 25, 2009
- Alternative Public Offering – Part 16 - May 26, 2009
- Alternative Public Offering – Part 17 - May 27, 2009
- Alternative Public Offering – Part 18 - May 28, 2009
- Alternative Public Offering – Part 19 - May 29, 2009
- Alternative Public Offering – Part 20 - May 30, 2009









No user commented in " Alternative Public Offering – Part 14 "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a TrackbackLeave A Reply